Lisbe Partners

Conscious Conversation

Ed Lisbe

Architects and contractors work with blueprints. Doctors follow standard operating procedures. Athletes use scientifically proven principles for developing strength, speed and stamina. Farmers have a rationale for where they plant and how they harvest. With all things important to us, humans are invariably more logical than haphazard.

Except in conversation.

In conversation we simply talk. We respond reactively to what the other person is saying, especially under stress or when a lot is at stake. Managers, salespeople, husbands and wives simply talk at each other. We don't tend to use blueprints. When we have something we think is important to say, we say it. Whether or not we should even be speaking at all instead of listening rarely shows up on most peoples' radar screen. We are then surprised by the results we get.

The Blueprint for Conversation

There is a blueprint for conversation. It is a technology almost as precise and predictable as a computer program, requiring that we ask and answer only one question at all times throughout any conversation:

      "Whose turn is it to speak or to listen?"

The answer to that question is always determined by the answer to a second question, "Who's got the stronger emotion?" Since emotions shift between people in conversations, the speaking or listening turns will also shift.

These two questions are conversation process questions. People in conversation tend to pay attention only to the content of what is being discussed. Paying attention to both the process and the content of a conversation is necessary if one wants to be successful with "people skills." This dual concentration requires a great deal of consciousness. The on-going consciousness, on both the process and the content of a conversation at the same time, is why we call our work "Conscious Conversation."

The one reason, and the only need for bringing a process consciousness into conversations is because people are always speaking on each other's "speaking turn." This is what we do to each other, especially when we think we are right - as a manager, a salesperson, a parent, or a teacher. We all want the microphone. That is the universal human communication problem.

Being conscious in conversation is very different from having good intentions. This work is about results, not intentions, and "people skills" results will only happen with consciousness. When a conversation doesn't work, invariably it can be traced to one of the two people (or more if it is a team communication problem) speaking inappropriately on the other person's "speaking turn." This is true whether the conversation is an inherently difficult one at work such as a Performance Review where both peoples' emotions are very high, or the conversation is at home between a parent and child talking about room cleaning or homework.

Good managers who are weak in "people skills" do not need a variety of training programs, or a great deal of time to change their habits and attitudes to bring them up to speed. Understanding the speaking and listening sides of a conversation will bring them immediate results with others.

Next: Whose Turn Is It?

Return to Conscious Conversation Main Page